behavioural tendenciesapparently, i am only 17.55424% geek, which makes me less geeky than andrew but not geeky enough to understand how or why my score was calculated to seven significant digits. can geekiness really be measured that precisely? what did you get?
and, scientific proof that men revel in revenge and women are softies even if the fuckers deserve it.
sadie scored 30.99647%
dan dine scored 15.58185%
ian scored 15.3% (note how he dropped the extra significant digits!)
and clearly, the canadians are leading in the great geek ranks, with
neil scoring 39.44773%
and my brothers nic and jonie scoring 38.65878% and 25-something% respectively.
(btw, sadie is an honourary canadian due to her commonwealth heritage)